Docket Number

20080715

Document Type

Legal Brief

Publication Date

2008

Abstract

Court of Appeals No. 20080715 District Court No. 00600007 PETITION FOR REHEARING This is a Petition for Rehearing of the Court's December 24, 2009 Memorandum Decision, affirming the trial court's denial of Mr. Henshaw's Rule 60(b) Motion to set aside that portion of the trial court's Order on Motions for Directed Verdict holding Raymond Watrous' interest in the water rights the Kings sold to the Watrouses did not ultimately pass to Mr. Henshaw through a series of deeds from the Kings to the Watrouses and ultimately to Mr. Henshaw, due to the Kings lack of standing to even assert that Raymond Watrous' interest in the water rights did not ultimately pass to Mr. Henshaw through a series of deeds from the Kings to the Watrouses and ultimately to Mr. Henshaw

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Charles A. Schultz; attorney for appellant.
David R. Williams, Anthony M. Grover; Woodbury and Kesler; attorneys for appellees.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

COinS