Docket Number

20041040

Document Type

Brief of Appellant

Publication Date

2004

Abstract

Appellant, Jamis M. Johnson ("Mr. Johnson"), appearing pro se, respectfully files his Appellant's Brief pursuant to Rule 24, Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure ("URAP"). The Summary Judgment below granting an order to extend the judgment against Appellant should be vacated, as a matter of law, because there remain to be tried genuine issues of material fact raised by Appellant Johnson below which issues include Mr. Johnson's challenges to the validity of the assigned judgment in the hands of the assignee Jayson Orvis, Plaintiff below and Appellee here, and the validity of the actual assignment itself of the same judgment to Mr. Orvis. Dated this 27th Day of May, 2005.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Jamis M. Johnson; Appellant Pro Se.
Unknown.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

COinS