Docket Number

890355

Document Type

Legal Brief

Publication Date

1989

Abstract

Since the filing of the briefs in this matter, it has come to my attention that several appellate courts in the Pacific Region, and several other courts of review throughout the country, have specifically addressed the due process, equal protection, and "pit bull" identification issues raised in this appeal. For that reason, pursuant to Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 24(j), I am providing the following list of supplemental authorities.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Kent Christianson; Attorney for Respondent.
David Paul White; Attorney for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

COinS