Docket Number

990484

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

1999

Abstract

Defendants7/Appellees' brief presents their case for what it truly is: a collection of shadows, shades, and inferences from the various statutes. Nowhere in their brief, and indeed nowhere in Utah law, can the Appellees point to directly applicable legal authority to sustain their argument. A plain reading of Utah law leads to the conclusion that the trial court's summary judgment should be reversed.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Jody K. Burnett; Williams & Hunt; Stephan F. Noel; Smith, Knowles, & Hamilton; Attorneys for Appellees.
Brad C. Smith; Stevenson & Smith; Attorney for Appellants.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

COinS