Docket Number

20061175

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2006

Abstract

This is an appeal from a directed verdict ruling that one-half of the water sold to the Warrouses by the Kkigs did not pass to Mildred Watrous upon the death of Raymond Watrous and the ttial court's denial of Mr. Henshaw's Motion under Rule 60(b) URCP to set aside the Order on the Kings motion for a directed verdict so that he could appeal the order on the King's directed verdict.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
David R. Williams; Woodbury & Kesler.
Charles A. Schultz.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

COinS