Docket Number
880660
Document Type
Brief of Respondent
Publication Date
1988
Abstract
Pursuant to Rule 24 (j) of the Rules of Utah Court of Appeals, Appellant cites the case of Garrett v. Ellison, 73 P.2d 449, 93 Utah 184, 129 ALR 666 (1937) on the proposition of the applicability of the Parol Evidence Rule to the facts of this case included under the Argument (Introduction) section of the appellant's opening Brief (pp. 6 and 7).
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Brief of Respondent, Tates v. Salisbury, No. 880660 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1988).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/1447
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Robert S. Howell; Lorin D. Ronnow; Tibbals, Howell & Moxley; Attorneys for Respondent.
Royal K. Hunt; Attorney for Appellant.