Docket Number

900418

Document Type

Legal Brief

Publication Date

1990

Abstract

Pursuant to Rule 24(j)# Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellant cites Ex parte Carpenter. Ala. Sup. Ct., No, 1900342, August 30, 1991 (49 Cr. Law Reptr. 1510), in support of his argument that the officers did not have a reasonable articulable suspicion to detain him based on an informant's tip. This argument is found at pages 12-13 of Appellant's opening brief and pages 4-6 of Appellant's reply brief and was discussed in oral argument. A copy of a digest of the opinion from Volume 49 of the Criminal Law Reporter is attached hereto.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
R. Paul Van Dam; Attorney General; Attorney for Appellee.
Candice A. Johnson; Joan C. Watt; Attorney for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Download

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS