State of Utah v. Daniel Lee Allen: Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

990902

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

1999

Abstract

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

DEFENDANT APPEALS THE COURT'S RULING OF CHARGING HIM FOR MORE RESTITUTION AFTER THE PROBATiON PERIOD HAD BEEN OFFICIALLY SATISFACTORILY TERMINATED

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Herbert Wm. Gillespie; Duchesne County Attorney; Catherine M. Johnson; Assistant Attorney General; Attorneys for Appellee.
Cindy Barton-Coombs;Attorney for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Utah v. Allen, No. 990902 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1999).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/2386