Docket Number


Document Type

Brief of Appellant

Publication Date



Appeal from the decision of the Utah Court of Appeals holding that the district court made no mistake of law and did not abuse its discretion when it sentenced the Appellant more severely on his voyeurism conviction following his de novo trial than the justice court had sentenced. Petition for Writ of Certiorari was granted by this Court by order entered November 15, 2011.


Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
M Douglas Bayly;Brent M. Johnson; Attorney for Appellee.
Richard G. Uday; Uday Law Office; Charles R. Stewart; Schatz Anderson and Associates; Attorney for Appellant.


Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Included in

Law Commons