The appellant's attorney harmony with Anders v. California* 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) , stated that issues raised on appeal are not sound in the above entitled case, in 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1296, it is his opinion that the and has requested that he be allowed to withdraw. Respondent feels that the brief filed by appellantfs counsel is in substantial compliance with the requirements of State v. Clayton, Utah, 639 P.2d 168 (1981> rnos. 16996 and 17140 decided December 15, 1981),
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Legal Brief, Utah v. Bankhead, No. 860012.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986).