Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons
The Failure of Market Efficiency, William Magnuson BYU Law Review
PDF
Gender, Credentials, and M&A, Tracey E. George, Mitu Gulati, Albert Yoon BYU Law Review
The Case for Empowering Quality Shareholders, Lawrence A. Cunningham BYU Law Review
Merchant Restraints in Ohio v. American Express—Why the Supreme Court Got It Wrong, Trent Earl Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Harm to Competition and the Competitive Process: a Circular Charade in the LIBOR Antitrust Litigation, Sharon E. Foster Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
Antitrust Economics for Proof of Concerted Price-Fixing: Practical Points for U.S. and Korean Antiturst Jurisprudence, Chang-Su Choe Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
Comparative Deterrence from Private Enforcement and Criminal Enforcement of the U.S. Antitrust Laws, Robert H. Land, Joshua P. Davis BYU Law Review
American Antitrust Jurisprudence Applied to European Commission v. Intel, Paul Jones Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
American Precedent, Australian Legislation—Are the Rules of Golf in Violation of Antitrust Law, Lynden Griggs, Leela Cejnar Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
Insider Trading and Soft Information: U.S. v. Nacchio, Andrew Law BYU Law Review
Analyzing Refusal-to-Deal Cases Under Brooke Group’s Predatory Pricing Test: The Tenth Circuit Misses the Mark in Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co. , Paul Jones BYU Law Review
Atomism and the Private Merger Challenge, Paul Stancil Faculty Scholarship
Anti-Monopoly Law in China: A Socialist Market Economy Wrestles with Its Antitrust Regime, Jared A. Berry Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
Conglomerating Antitrust Policy by Comparative Example: A Conceptual Analysis of Merger Regulation in the United States, Japan, and the European Union, Jonathan T. Trexler Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
Tarnishment and the FTDA: Lessening the Capacity to Identify and Distinguish, Layne T. Smith BYU Law Review
Analyzing U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction over Foreign Parties After Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffinan-LaRoche, Ltd., Andrew Stanger BYU Law Review
Clear Inarticulation--State Action Antitrust Immunity and State Agencies: Neo Gen Screening, Inc. v. New England Newborn Screening Program, Shane L. Keppner BYU Law Review
www.FranchiseDisclosure.com: Assessing the FTC's Proposed Franchise Rule Provisions Involving Electronic Disclosure, Perry C. Siatis BYU Law Review
The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect, Michael A. Carrier BYU Law Review
Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital: The Fourth Circuit's Antitrust Analysis for Peer Review Actions Under the Sherman Act, Christopher Laurent Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
The Syufy Rosetta Stone, BYU Law Review
Economic Rents and Essential Facilities, Keith N. Hylton BYU Law Review
Determining the Indirect Purchaser's Right to Sue in the Conte:tt of Regulated Utilities: Kansas & Missouri v. Utilicorp United, Inc., Brett L. Hopper BYU Law Review
Shaping Antitrust Enforcement: Greater Emphasis on Barriers to Entry, David L. White BYU Law Review
Market Power as a Threshold Requirement in Antitrust Summary Judgments: Assam Drug Co. v. Miller Brewing Co., Brian L. Dew Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Antitrust: Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.-A Better Rule For Vertical Restraints, But Is It Legal?, Scott G. Crowley BYU Law Review
Reflections on a Landmark: Shaffer v. Heitner Viewed from a Distance, Earl M. Maltz BYU Law Review
Mitsubishi and Antitrust Arbitration-It's All the Japanese You Need to Know, Robert M. Donaldson BYU Law Review
Judicial Application of the Newspaper Preservation Act: Will Congressional Intent Be Relegated to the Back Pages?, John S. Martel, Victor J. Hayden III BYU Law Review
Civil Antitrust Liability Based on Apparent Authority: American Society of Mechanical Egineers v. Hydrolevel Corp., Carl W. Sonne BYU Law Review
Cellular Mobile Radio Telecommunications: Regulating and Emgerging Industry, Phillip Palmer BYU Law Review
An Assessment of State and Federal Jurisdiction to Regulate Access Charges After the AT&T Divestiture, Jeffery A. Robinson BYU Law Review
Right to Sue Under Section 4 of the Clayton Act - The Employee Deischarged for Regusal to Participate in the Anitcompetivie Practices of His Employer: Bichan v. Chemetron Corp. Examined in Light of Blue Shield v. Mcready, Ralph N. Bryson BYU Law Review
Doctors' Maximum Fee Plan is Unlawful Per Se Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act: Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, Craig L. Taylor BYU Law Review
The Antitrust Laws and the Rights of the Patentees: A Defense of Limited Compulsory Licensing, Brian W. Peckham BYU Law Review
The Ebb and Flow of Antitrust Enforcement: The Reagan and Carter Administrations, Sanford M. Litvack BYU Law Review
The Supreme Court and Antitrust Law: Remarks on Judicial Restraint in the Context of Antitrust and Constitutional Law, Rex E. Lee BYU Law Review
State Action Antitrust Immunity-A Doctrine in Search of Definition, James C. Burling, William F. Lee, James L. Quarles III BYU Law Review
Tying Arrangements-An Update, Marcus Mattson BYU Law Review
Standards for the Application of United States Antitrust Law in an International Environment, William F. Baxter BYU Law Review
Live, Human-made Bacteria As Patentable Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. 5 101: Diamond v. Chakrabarty, Brent J. Jensen BYU Law Review
Contribution Among Antitrust Violators: A Question of Legal Process, C. Douglas Floyd BYU Law Review
Antitrust: Shared Information Between the FTC and the Department of Justice, Judy Beckner Sloan BYU Law Review
Certification: A Practical Devise for Early Screening of Spurious Antitrust Litigation, W. Cole Durham Jr., Jonathan A. Dibble BYU Law Review
Antitrust Law-Sherman Act-State Action Immunity - Immunity Denied to State Approved Utility Practice - Cantor u. Detroit Edison Co., BYU Law Review
Antitrust Law--The Clayton Act--"Engaged in Commerce" Requirement of Section 7--United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries, BYU Law Review
Advanced Search