How Modern Treatment of 35 U.S.C. § 112(6) Has Caused Confusion: Hilton Davis v. Warner-Jenkinson and the Right to a Jury on the Issue of Patent Infringement Under the "Equitable" Doctrine of Equivalents

Authors

David R. Todd

Rights

© 1996 J. Reuben Clark Law School

Recommended Citation

David R. Todd, How Modern Treatment of 35 U.S.C. § 112(6) Has Caused Confusion: Hilton Davis v. Warner-Jenkinson and the Right to a Jury on the Issue of Patent Infringement Under the "Equitable" Doctrine of Equivalents, 1996 BYU L. Rev. 141 (1996).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol1996/iss1/3