United Park City Mines Company v. Greater Park City Co., Royal Street Land Co., Deer Valley Resort Co., Royal Street Of Utah, Royal Street Development Co., Atlantic Richfield Co., Formerly The Anaconda Co., Asarco, Inc., Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York, Fidelity Bank Of Philadelphia, Greater Properties, Inc., Park Properties, Inc., Alpine Meadows Of Tahoe, Inc. : Unknown
Dear Clerk: On behalf of defendants-appellees Greater Park City Co. and Alpine Meadows of Tahoe, Inc., I am writing pursuant to Rule 24(j), Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure to advise the Court of certain supplemental authorities. In footnote 11 on pages 15-16 of the Reply Brief of Appellant United Park City Mines Co., a case is cited for the proposition that alleged concealment by a defendant tolls the statute of limitations as to all defendants. I would like to cite the following supplemental authorities for the proposition that the statute of limitations is tolled only as to the defendants alleged to have concealed: Griffin v. McNiff, 744 F.Supp. 1237 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) at 1256, n. 20, and the other cases cited in n. 20. As per Rule 24(j) enclosed are 9 copies of this letter. Since this case is set for argument next Tuesday,
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Legal Brief, United Park City Mines v. Greater Park City Co., No. 900306 (Utah Supreme Court, 1990).