Docket Number
890345
Document Type
Legal Brief
Publication Date
1989
Abstract
PETITION FOR REHEARING
COME NOW Plaintiffs and petition for a rehearing of the appeal. The points of law and fact the Court overlooked and misapprehended are the facts in this case evaluated within the analysis expressed in Maxfield v. Rushton, 115 Ut. Adv. Rep. 33, 35; 779 P. 2d 237, 239. There this Court held that a Trial Court's discretion must be balanced against the high priority of affording disputants an opportunity to be heard and to do justice between them. The most important factor is whether justice may result from the dismissal. Although the dismissal in Maxfield was upheld, it was in a circumstance where the appellant avoided an actual trial setting at the last moment.
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Legal Brief, Stocking v. First Federal Savings, No. 890345 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1989).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/1954
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
L. Brent Hoggan, Esq.; Olson & Hoggan; N. George Daines, Esq.; Daines .
Raymond N. Malouf, Esq.; Attorney for Appellant.