The State of Utah v. Timothy Kevin Duncan : Unknown

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

900217

Document Type

Legal Brief

Publication Date

1990

Abstract

I wish to cite to the Court State v. Morrell, 149 Utah Adv. Rep. 26, 30 n.2 (Utah Ct. App. Nov. 30, 1990), as additional support for the State's contention in Duncan that a guilty plea alone does not constitute a conviction for purposes of rule 609(a)(2), Utah Rules of Evidence. Br. of Appellee at 4-8.

This supplemental authority is submitted pursuant to rule 24(j), Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
R. Paul Van Dam; Attorney General; Attorney for Appellee.
Charles F. Loyd, Jr., Ronald S. Fujino; Salt Lake Legal Defender Assoc.; Attorneys for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Legal Brief, Utah v. Duncan, No. 900217 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1990).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/2607