The State of Utah v. Timothy Kevin Duncan : Unknown

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

900217

Document Type

Legal Brief

Publication Date

1990

Abstract

Pursuant to Rule 24 (j) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, Defendant/Appellant Timothy Kevin Duncan cites the following supplemental authority to support his argument that a guilty plea is a conviction as long as it is used for impeachment purposes and not as evidence. Machibroda v. United States, 3 68 U.S. 487, 493 (1962); see also Appellant's reply brief at 7 n.2.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
R. Paul Van Dam; Attorney General; Attorney for Appellee.
Charles F. Loyd, Jr., Ronald S. Fujino; Salt Lake Legal Defender Assoc.; Attorneys for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Legal Brief, Utah v. Duncan, No. 900217 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1990).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/2608