State of Utah v. Douglas A. Cattelan : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

920576

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

1992

Abstract

PROSE APPEAL FROM A DENIAL OF DEFENDANT'S "MOTION TO CORRECT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE" ARISING FROM DEFENDANTS CONVICTION OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY, A FIRST DEGREE FELONY, IN VIOLATION OF UTAH CODE ANN. 76-6-302 (1990) IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE STANTON M. TAYLOR. THIS REPLY BRIEF IS BASED ON PERTINENT MISSTATED FACTS AND INACCURACIES OF THE APPEAL'S BRIEF WHICH ARE DETERMINATIVE ISSUES IN THE IS APPEAL, AND PLAIN ERROR RULING OF U.S. SUPREME COURT IN YOUNG.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
R. Paul Van Dam; Attorney General; Christine F. Soltis; Assistant Attorney General; Attorneys for Appellee .
Douglas A. Cattelan; Pro Se Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Utah v. Cattelan, No. 920576 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1992).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/3547