Stephen E. Hausknect v. Kennecott Corporation and Industrial Commission of Utah : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

930738

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

1993

Abstract

PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF Case No. 930768-CA ARGUMENT PRIORITY CLASSIFICATION: Rule 29(b)(7) PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER OF CLARIFICATION ISSUED BY INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
James M. Elegante, Barbara K. Polich; Parsons, Behle & Latimer; Thomas C. Sturdy, Sharon J. Eblen, Alan K. Flake; Industrial Commission of Utah; attorneys for respondent.
Erik Strindberg, Martha S. Stonebrook; Cohne, Rappaport & Segal; attorney for petitioner.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Hausknect v. Kennecott, No. 930738 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1993).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/5648