Docket Number
990902
Document Type
Reply Brief
Publication Date
1999
Abstract
REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
DEFENDANT APPEALS THE COURT'S RULING OF CHARGING HIM FOR MORE RESTITUTION AFTER THE PROBATiON PERIOD HAD BEEN OFFICIALLY SATISFACTORILY TERMINATED
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Reply Brief, Utah v. Allen, No. 990902 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1999).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/2386
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Herbert Wm. Gillespie; Duchesne County Attorney; Catherine M. Johnson; Assistant Attorney General; Attorneys for Appellee.
Cindy Barton-Coombs;Attorney for Appellant.