Docket Number
20010509
Document Type
Legal Brief
Publication Date
2001
Abstract
I am writing pursuant to rule 24(i), Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, to advise the Court of authority relevant to the above-referenced case that recently came to my attention. The following cases relate to defendant's claim that the trial court was without jurisdiction when it resentenced him while the case was on appeal. These cases support the State's argument that a sentence imposed on an unrepresented defendant is illegal and may be corrected by the trial court at any time under rule 22(e), Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure:
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Legal Brief, State v. Angelos, No. 20010509 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2001).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/3357
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Brett J. Delporto; Assistant Attorney General.
Scott Wiggins; William K. McGuire; Deputy David County Attorney; attorneys for defendant; .