Docket Number
20010771
Document Type
Brief of Appellee
Publication Date
2001
Abstract
Response to Appellant's Brief and Cross-appeal to Order entered August 24, 2001, by the Honorable Timothy R. Hanson, Judge in the Third Judicial District Court, that Appellee's attorney's lien does not attach to future ongoing child support owed by Petitioner to Respondent but is otherwise a valid and enforceable statutory lien under Utah Code Ann. § 78-51-41, and shall attach to all property awarded the Respondent in the divorce proceeding, including past child support that has been reduced to judicial judgment or judgment by operation of law pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 78-45-9.3, but that ruled that Appellee's attorney's lien does not attach to future or ongoing child support on the grounds that future child support belongs to the child of the parties.
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Brief of Appellee, Fisher v. Fisher, No. 20010771 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2001).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/3478
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Steven Wade Fisher; Pro Se Petitioner.
Nanette Fisher Pro se Respondent; Karma K. Dixon; Assistant Attorney General; Mark. L. Shurtleff; Attorney General; M. Dirk Eastmod; Appelle.