Docket Number
20030907
Document Type
Reply Brief
Publication Date
2003
Abstract
ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Reply Brief, Acosta v. Salt Lake Regional, No. 20030907 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2003).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/4626
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Richard Burke; King, Burke & Schaap; attorney for petitioner.
Michael E. Dyer, Kristy L. Bertelsen; Blackburn & Stoll; attorneys for respondent.