State of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Daniel Bagley Rogers Defendant/Appellant: Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

20030953

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2003

Abstract

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Plaintiff Appellant, DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERS Defendant/Appellant CaseNo.20030953-CA REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT Appeal from the Third District Court's Order denying Defendant's Motion to Quash the Bindover Order for trial on Theft by Receiving Stolen Property, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-408 (1999). Appellant is incarcerated.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Jeffrey S. Gray; Mark L. Shurtleff; Attorney General; Attorney for Appellee.
Debra M. Nelson; Shannon Romero; Salt Lake Legal Defender Assoc.; Attorneys for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Utah v. Rogers, No. 20030953 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2003).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/4656