Docket Number
20041039
Document Type
Brief of Appellant
Publication Date
2004
Abstract
PURSUANT TO RULE 9, Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, appellant submits this brief PURSUANT TO RULE 29, the argument priority is PRIORITY 2: Appeals from convictions in criminal matters. The Appellant is NOT incarcerated.
Rights
Public record document (some rights may be reserved).
Recommended Citation
Brief of Appellant, Orem v. Armstrong, No. 20041039 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2004).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/5396
Comments
Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Bruce Armstrong; pro se.
Unknown.