Salt Lake City v. Thomas Max Jaramillo : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

20041125

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2004

Abstract

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF Appeal from the trial court's order revoking defendant's probation and reinstating his suspended jail terms to be served consecutively even though the court did not designate the terms as consecutive at the original sentencing.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Padma Ceeru-Collings; Senior Assistant City Prosecutor; Aaron M. Aplin; Associate City Prosecutor; Salt Lake City Prosecutor\'s Office; Attorney for Plaintiff/Appellee.
Debra M. Nelson; Heather Johnson; Salt Lake Legal Defender Association; Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Salt Lake City v. Jaramillo, No. 20041125 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2004).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/5462