Frito-Lay and/or Transcontinental Insurance Company v. Utah Labor Commission and Amy C. Clausing : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

20061053

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2006

Abstract

APPEAL FROM ORDER OF THE JUDGE SESSION'S FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 23, 2005, AND THE ORDER DISMISSING RESPONDENT'S RULE 60(B) MOTION ENTERED BY THE APPEALS BOARD OF THE UTAH LABOR COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 23, 2006.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Theodore E. Kanell, John H. Romney; Plant, Christensen and Kanell; Attorneys for Appellant/Petitioner.
K. Dawn Atkin; Atkin and Associates; Attorneys for Appellee/Respondent.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Frito Lay v. Utah Labor Commission, Clausing, No. 20061053 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2006).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/6973