JimPurkey and Jan Purkey v. Kent Max Roberts and Jilene Roberts : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

20110365

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JIM PURKEY AND JAN PURKEY, Plaintiffs, v. KENT MAX ROBERTS AND JILENE ROBERTS*, Defendants/Cross-Claimants/ Appellant, V. DR. ROGER RUSSELL,* Cross-Defendant/Appellee. * - Parties on Appeal CaseNo.:20110365-CA Dist. Ct. Case No.: 070600015 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF Appeal from a Final Judgment and an Order denying Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment of the Sixth Judicial District Court in and for Sanpete County, The Honorable Marvin D. Bagley Presiding Charles W. Hanna (1326) LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES W. HANNA 50 W. Canyon Crest Rd. Alpine, UT 84004 Attorney for Appellee Michael E. Day (7843) Nathan Whittaker (11978) DAY SHELL & LILJENQUIST, L.C. 45 E. Vine St. Murray, UT 84107 Attorneys for Appellant ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED FILED UTAH APPELLATE COURTS

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Charles W. Hanna; Law Offices of Charles W. Hanna; Attorney for Appellee.
Michael E. Day; Nathan Whittaker; Day Shell & Liljenquist; Attorneys for Appellant.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Purkey v. Roberts, No. 20110365 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2011).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca3/2866