STATE OF UTAH, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. CULLEN CHRISTOPHER CARRICK, Defendant/Appellant. : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Court of Appeals

Docket Number

20160249

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2016

Abstract

SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

Pursuant to the Order of the Utah Court of Appeals dated June 18, 2019, to provide
supplemental briefing on "the failure to investigate alibi witnesses and to present a
timeline" issues on Rule 23B remand

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Scott L. Wiggins, Arnold & Wiggins P.C.; counsel for appellant.
Karen A. Klucznik, Sean D. Reyes, Utah Attorney General's Office; counsel for appellee.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Utah v. Carrick, No. 20160249 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2016).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca3/3914