State of Utah v. Richard Norris : Reply Brief

Authors

Utah Supreme Court

Docket Number

20040880.00

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2004

Abstract

APPEAL FROM THE UTAH COURT OF APPEAL'S JUDGMENT IN STATE V. NORRIS, 2004 UT APP 267, 97 P.3D 732, THAT THE COMMUNICATIONS FRAUD STATUTE IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD; THE STATE APPEALS FROM THE HOLDING THAT A CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A STATUTE IS JURISDICTIONAL IN NATURE.

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Jeffrey S. Gray; Assistant Attorney General; Mark L. Shurtleff; Attorney General; Attorneys for Utah.
Jennifer K. Gowans; Fillmore Spencer; Attorneys for Norris.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Utah v. Norris, No. 20040880.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 2004).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2/2547