Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah Department of Transportation; Utah Public Service Commission; Anderson Geneva Development, Inc.; and Town of Vineyard : Reply Brief of Appellant

Authors

Utah Supreme Court

Docket Number

20110326.00

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY On Appeal from a Final Order of the Utah Public Service Commission, The Honorable Ruben H. Arredondo

Comments

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.
Troy L. Booher; Christopher L. Stout; Zimmerman Jones Booher LLc; Dennis M. Astill; Dennis M. Astill, PC; Counsel for Anderson Geneva; Reha Kamas; Union Pacific Railroad Company; Counsel for Union Pacific Railroad Company; David L. church; Blaisdell and Church; counsel for Town of Vineyard; Brent A. Burnett; Assistant Attorney General; Counsel for Utah Department of Transportation; Bruce Jones; Utah Transit Authority; Counsel for Utah Transit Authority; Utah Public Service Commission.

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah Department of Transportation; Utah Public Service Commission; Anderson Geneva Development, Inc.; and Town of Vineyard, No. 20110326.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 2011).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2/3108