Recommended Citation
Christopher Greulich and Eric Talbot Jensen, Cyber Pillage, 26 Sw. J. Int’l L. 264 (2020)
Keywords
cyber, law of armed conflict, pillage, international humanitarian law, war, cyber war, armed conflict, piracy, plunder, civilians, Hague Convention, Geneva Convention, war crime, grave breach
Document Type
Law Review Article
Abstract
Despite its historically narrow application under International law, in today’s digital age, usage of the term “pillage” has expanded to include the theft of intellectual property carried out by cyber means. The modern usage notwithstanding, it appears the law of armed conflict still limits liability for pillage to the non-consensual takings of public or private property by members of armed forces and affiliated non-state actors during armed conflict for private or personal use. This article applies the historical perspective to modern cyber activities, including those on and off the battlefield, and clarifies that while many activities do not rise to the level of the war crime of “pillage,” certain activities can meet the definition of cyber pillage and lead to individual criminal liability under the law of armed conflict. As States contemplate cyber operations during armed conflict, they will need to ensure protections are in place to prevent and punish potential acts of cyber pillage.
Publisher
Southwestern Law School
Publication Title
Southwestern Journal of International Law