Doctrines of Last Resort
Recommended Citation
D. Gordon Smith, Doctrines of Last Resort, Rᴇᴠɪsɪᴛɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ Cᴏɴᴛʀᴀᴄᴛs Sᴄʜᴏʟᴀʀsʜɪᴘ ᴏғ Sᴛᴇᴡᴀʀᴛ Mᴀᴄᴀᴜʟᴀʏ: Oɴ ᴛʜᴇ Eᴍᴘɪʀɪᴄᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ Lʏʀɪᴄᴀʟ 426 (2013).
Keywords
good faith and fair dealing, fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, contracts
Document Type
Essay
Abstract
The doctrines of good faith and fair dealing, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment are doctrines of last resort because they are activated only when all other potentially applicable commands from constitutions, statutes, regulations, ordinances, common law decisions and contracts have been exhausted. In these circumstances ⎯ where positive law and private ordering are otherwise incomplete ⎯ contracting parties rely heavily on informal social sanctions to protect against opportunism, but the doctrines of last resort reinforce these social sanctions. Rather than regulating all of the deviations and adjustments that are common in contractual relationships, doctrines of last resort constrain extreme deviations from social norms, reinforcing agreements precisely in those contexts where informal social sanctions are weakest.
General Notes
Chapter 15 of Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay: On the Empirical and the Lyrical, Jean Braucher, John Kidwell, & William C. Whitford eds., 2013.
Publication Title
Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay: On the Empirical and the Lyrical