Rodney Martin, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Bernice Scholl, Executrix of George H. Chaffin Estate, Defendant, George H. Chaffin Investment Company, A Utah Limited Partnership, Defendant and Appellant : Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant George H. Chaffin Investment Company

Authors

Docket Number

17542

Document Type

Reply Brief

Publication Date

1982

Abstract

Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court of Utah County

Comments

Original Brief submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; funding for digitization provided by the Institute of Museum and Library Services through the Library Services and Technology Act, administered by the Utah State Library, and sponsored by the S.J. Quinney Law Library; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors.Arthur H. Nielsen, Clark R. Nielsen and John D. Russell ; Attorneys for Appellants

Rights

Public record document (some rights may be reserved).

Recommended Citation

Reply Brief, Martin v. Scholl, No. 17542 (1982).
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/uofu_sc2/7277